Thursday, January 15, 2015

Jim Wallis tells us "How People of Faith Should Respond to Paris"

In my opinion, Jim Wallis is a prophet of our time. This is an interesting blog entry that stimulates thinking on terrorism no matter your religious beliefs. It also calls us into account for the racism we have shown by not demonstrating our anger and grief in a similar manner to the terrorist violence in Nigeria and the terrible loss of lives.

Je Suis … [?] How People of Faith Should Respond to Paris


Our first response to the horrible and frightening violence of Paris should be grief. False religion always makes the religious grieve, but when it engages in ghastly violence against other human beings who are made in God’s image, it should break our hearts as it breaks God’s.
Anky / Shutterstock.com
Peaceful protest in Place de la Republique in Paris in response to the Charlie Hebdo attacks, Anky / Shutterstock.com

 These hateful terrorists, masquerading as religious believers, said on video they were the “avengers” of the prophet Mohamed. As such, they murdered cartoonists in the office of a magazine they identified with blasphemy. What these killers, and those like them, don’t understand is that they are the real blasphemers now by forcing their false and murderous distortions of Islam on the world and on other children of God. Their religion is now violence itself, a blasphemous interpretation of Islam, which in its truest expression is a religion of peace. Rev. Wes Granberg-Michaelson, from the Reformed Church in America, has called Paris an “identity theft” of the Muslim faith. Several Muslim leaders have said that the damage terrorists like these do to the image of the Prophet Mohammed is much greater than any cartoonist could ever do.

While the tenet of freedom of speech has been invoked throughout the media coverage of the attacks, the religious implications here run much deeper. They are about how we in the faith community should respond when we are attacked by those who disdain us, disrespect us, distort us — as many believe the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo regularly did — and even viciously attack us. The magazine has often crudely, provocatively, and even gleefully satirized all religions in very offensive ways, suggesting that the fundamentalisms in all our religious traditions completely define the meaning of faith. Charlie Hebdo is apparently driven by its own ideology of secular fundamentalism, which regularly strikes out at all people of faith.

But how genuine faith communities respond to those who offend them is the key issue here. Jesus tells us to bless those who persecute us, to return love for hate and good for evil, and even to love our enemies. Loving your enemies certainly includes supporting the foundational commitment to free speech, and defending the right of free speech, even, or especially, for those who offend you.
Satire is often needed and necessary to expose the powerful, or to reveal society’s hypocritical and often humorous foibles. The biblical prophets used both satire and humor to challenge the mighty and the selfish, and even Jesus acted and spoke in similar ways that undermined religious hypocrisy and political oppression.

Is satire always contributive and healing for a good society? Of course not. But whether satire and humor sometimes cross lines of decency or civility, or whether it always contributes to the common good, granting freedom of speech is the necessary safeguard for open and democratic societies. No one can be allowed to curb free speech with the veto of violence, and that’s what many around the world, both non-religious and religious, are now standing up for.
Ross Douthat said it well, “Must all deliberate offense-giving, in any context, be celebrated, honored, praised? I think not. But in the presence of the gun — or, as in the darker chapters of my own faith’s history, the rack or the stake — both liberalism and liberty require that it be welcomed and defended.” Admiring the cartoons of Charlie Hebdo is not the point. The slain cartoonists are being lifted up and supported — not for the content of their work, but for the principle of standing up to threats of violent suppression.

The worldwide opposition to the brutality of these murderers is what’s most important, even among people who would not say "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie").

Many of us have been more drawn to the Muslim policeman, Ahmed Marabet, who was killed trying to defend the staff at Charlie Hebdo. Some have pointed to the suggestion of Dyab Abou Jahjah, a Belgian newspaper columnist and Muslim, who said in a tweet:
His tweet points to a powerful truth: millions and millions of Muslims in our world would be proud of that Muslim policeman’s behavior and are deeply embarrassed, grieved, and increasingly angered about the totally false and completely distorted representations of their religion that was claimed by the murderers in Paris.

It is very important to remember that fundamentalism in all our faith traditions — Muslim, Christian, and Jewish — will be far more effectively defeated from the inside than from the outside. New calls for attacks and restrictions on Muslim people in France, Europe, and the United States will only make the terrorism worse and recruit more marginalized young people for their cause.

At the same time, as the world mourned Paris, we saw that more than 2,000 people were also murdered by the violent terrorists of Boko Haram in Nigeria — a brutal slaughter of innocent civilians, including many women and children, which has received far less coverage and attention than the violence in the western country of France. That painful and racial hypocrisy, which happens over and over again in our focus on terrorism, must be addressed if our response to global terrorism is going to have any moral integrity.

We will not defeat frightening and growing terrorist violence with more wars, more drones, and more repression of Muslim peoples. The absolute best strategy to defeat the terrorism we just saw in Paris and in Nigeria will be a new and unified mission by global faith communities around the world to defeat fundamentalism from within — by replacing false religion with the powerful expression and assertion of genuine religion with love, grace, mercy, and forgiveness. It’s time to make that our new campaign.

Jim Wallis is president of Sojourners. His book,The (Un)Common Good: How the Gospel Brings Hope to a World Divided, the updated and revised paperback version of On God’s Side, is available now. Follow Jim on Twitter @JimWallis.
Image: Peaceful protest in Place de la Republique in Paris in response to the Charlie Hebdo attacks, Anky / Shutterstock.com

Sunday, October 5, 2014

Stressed? It Will Be Okay! (Part Three)


Now, back to the story…

Bob replied to Amy, “I’m sitting down.” Actually he was draped over the chaise lounge in our room at the Union League Club in Chicago and quite comfortable.

“You’re not going to like what I have to say,” Amy started. Savoy and its environs was experiencing what was being called the storm of the century. Somewhere between three and five inches of rain had fallen in a relatively short period of time, and sewer water (from our shower drain and a drain in the electrical storage area) was spreading throughout the basement…soaking over 1500 square feet of not very old carpet. Amy and David armed with a carpet cleaner and shop vacuum were valiantly trying to stem the tide, but it was a losing battle.

Clearly we were needed at home. We made arrangements with friends to ride back to Savoy with them after the dinner, toasts, and first dances at the wedding reception. We arrived around midnight to find Amy still doing laundry (many of their things had been on the floor downstairs), and the babies asleep in their pack and plays ensconced in Bob’s office. Bob sent out a call to ServPro, and we settled into bed. Poor Amy was relegated to a too short living room couch that night but was provided with a queen-sized blow-up mattress from then on. Let’s just say that the living conditions were not ideal for any of us in several ways. Read on.

Right before we left for the wedding, our cable service had been interrupted. Since we have a bundle package, it meant there was no phone land line (yes, we are ancient), no cable TV, and no Internet. Almost unbearable. Amy had been a trooper and called our cable provider each day trying to arrange an appointment. She’d been given promises, but no action. Bob put a call in on Sunday and was able to finally get on the schedule for Tuesday. (It makes me furious that it takes a man to resolve these things. Don’t tell me that there is equality for the sexes when women still have to suffer through this! Ah, but I digress.)

A ServPro crew arrived late Sunday. The company’s employees were working very long hours trying to provide service to many who needed help. (Our next door neighbors and our friends across the street had sewage back up, too, while others were coping with basements full of storm water.) They tore up and disposed of the carpet and padding and set up nine air movers and two large dehumidifiers. 

That was just the beginning...

Saturday, September 13, 2014

A Ladies Brunch and Feminism

I'm a feminist. I've been a female for a long time now. It'd be stupid not to be on my own side.                                                                                    - Maya Angelou

The following is an email that I sent this evening to the Dean of the College of Business at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Excuse me. I apologize for not reading the July business info e-mail earlier, but I was shocked when I read it this evening and saw the title of the August 10th event, “MBAs & Mimosas: A Ladies Brunch at HUB 51.” I thought those “ladies” events were long over. I’ve lived through years of being the spouse of a physician (when most physicians were male) and being invited to attend ”ladies events.” However, as a holder of 3 degrees from the UIUC (including an MBA), I don’t want to be addressed by the term “lady” in any business or professional situation, nor do I think those pondering an MBA should be so addressed either. This is just one example of how women do not have equality in the workplace, in universities, or in our society as a whole. How subtle you’ve been and how prejudiced.
 
Need I remind you that I filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights when I was denied admission to the EMBA program in the early 1980s. How sad that little has changed in the College of Business.